NARRATIVE in Film
Narrative is the art of storytelling,
something we all do every day. It is an important part of our lives and
something that we value highly. When we watch a film or TV or read we are
receiving narratives.
We are going to look at narratives in Film
& Broadcast Fiction although there are narratives in ads. and news items.
The narrative begins with the opening of
the film or TV drama.
We are used to watching TV and films and
getting meanings out of them and working out the plot or story is a key way we
do this.
Plot and Story.
In Media Studies there is a difference
between the meaning of plot and story.
The plot is what is present (visibly
& audibly) in the film and in the order in which you get it.
E.G.
Lord Pasta is found dead. Detective Bolognese is called in to investigate. She
discovers the murderer was his nephew Douggie Spaggs who was next in line for
the title and inheritance.
The story is all the things that
happen in the narrative, both the ones that we see in the film and the ones we
infer or are referred to. The story includes things that we can assume are
happening (like eating and sleeping) which are not shown because they would be
boring as part of the plot. It might include things we only find out later,
such as Norman’s mental condition in Psycho.
E.G. Douggie Spaggs is short of money and
kills his uncle to inherit but is caught by Bolognese of the Yard.
The plot of a thriller might include things
in the wrong order – it might include flashbacks for example – and yet we try
and work out the ‘solution’. We can only use the evidence in the plot. We would
feel cheated if parts of the story were suddenly revealed at the very end that
we couldn’t have possibly guessed.
The story of Pulp Fiction would be
the film reassembled in the right order.
Think about:
·
Do we (as viewers) know more
that the characters in the film or the same? (About some things, irrelevant to
the plot, we obviously know a lot less.)
·
In a thriller or detective
story, do we know who did it or are we working at the same pace as the
detective? Do we try to get to the solution before Morse/Frost/Rebus/Poirot? Do
we use the clues in the plot to work out who did it or media conventions? (e.g.
the murderer is always the least likely suspect)
·
Give examples of dramatic
irony.
·
How is suspense built up in a
plot?
·
What is the effect of
flashbacks on the building of suspense?
The Voice.
Another part of the construction of
narratives involves the ‘voice’ telling the story.
A first-person narration will use “I” as
the voice of the teller. Such a narrative cannot give the reader access to
events that “I” could not have seen or been told. In a film or TV narrative
they will need a voice-over to tell the story from a personal point of view.
A third-person or impersonal narrative is a
story which seems to be written by God/Goddess. This is common in film or TV
narratives where events seem to be unfolding before us.
·
Blade Runner was made in two different versions – with a voice-over and without
(The Director’s Cut) Do you know why?
Narrative theories suggest that stories
(in whatever media) share certain features (but particular media tell stories
in different ways.)
Narrative theory 1: Propp
Propp looked at folk tales and saw some
structures they shared in common. He found 8 character roles and 31 functions
that move the story along.
The 8 character roles can also be types of
action because they are not the sort of roles which appear in the cast list.
One character in the film or play can occupy several of his character roles or
types of action. They are:
1.
The villain
2.
The hero (not always good but
always carries the story along, the central character and not always male)
3.
The donor (who provides an
object with some special property)
4.
The helper (who helps the hero)
5.
The princess (the reward for the
hero and object of the villain’s schemes)
6.
Her father (who rewards the
hero)
7.
The dispatcher (who sends the
hero on his way)
8.
The false hero
The 31 functions include events such as:
The hero is
prohibited from doing something
The villain learns
something about the victim
The villain is
punished, etc.
·
Does this work for your
favourite film? A Bond Movie? A news story? Star Wars?
Narrative Theory 2: Todorov
Todorov also saw underlying structures to
narratives.
He argued that stories all begin in “equilibrium”
when all forces are in balance.
This is disrupted by a problem to
cause “disequilibrium”. Then more events take place before a “new
equilibrium” is established.
Many film makers today don’t bother setting
up the normal world in order to disrupt it with a problem (a killer shark,
etc.) and go straight for the problem and disequilibrium. However, there will
always be a sense in the film of what life was like before the problem came
along and therefore what the characters can return to if they can only sort the
problem out.
·
Does this work for your
favourite film? A Bond Movie? A news story? Fatal Attraction? Jaws?
Narrative Theory 3: Barthes
Barthes suggested that narrative works with
different codes which the reader tries to make sense of. The most obvious is
the use of enigma codes. These are little puzzles which the audience
needs to solve throughout the plot. This makes us work but gives us pleasure
when we solve them correctly. The plot might need the solving a big enigma code
but there will be little ones along the way.
Narrative Theory 4: Lévi-Strauss
He argued that all meaning-making, not just
narratives, depend on binary oppositions – a conflict between two
sides/qualities which are opposites.
E.G. Westerns where there can be many
binary oppositions such as:
Cowboys
|
Indians
|
settlers
|
natives
|
Christian
|
Pagan
|
domestic
|
savage
|
weak
|
strong
|
garden
|
wilderness
|
The law
|
outlaws
|
helpless
|
dangerous
|
clothed
|
naked
|
whites
|
redskins
|
telegraph
|
smoke signals
|
Ads. also use binary oppositions such as
spots/Clearasil
Dirty/Persil, Daz/Brand X, young/old,
dandruff/Head & Shoulders, etc.
Myths use binary oppositions all the time
such as God/Devil, Good/Evil.
·
Make a grid, as above, for
Sci-Fi films
Narrative Theory 5: Syd Field
Syd is a practicing screenwriter and his
theory is more of a piece of advice for potential film makers. He is interested
in the way one thing leads to another or causality. As you watch a film you
should see a structure of events develop as things lead to other things.
Field says a typical Hollywood film can be
separated into three separate dramatic sections or acts.
Act 1 is the setup. The first 10 mins is very important to grab the audience. If they
like it in the first 10 mins they are unlikely to change their minds later. The
film maker should show the audience who the main character is and why they
should care what happens to him/her. They should see what style and genre the
film is going to use. The next 20 mins show the audience the nature of the
problem the hero has to face or this can be left to plot point 1.
Act 2 is the confrontation. The longest act shows us the hero in more and more extreme problem
situations. He/she is helpless against the opposing forces. There may be a
mid-point where they start to turn things around but not until plot-point 2
will they realise the way to succeed…
Act 3 is the resolution. The hero wins out (often by confronting the opposing forces on
their own territory)
Where Act 1 becomes Act 2 and Act 2 becomes
Act 3 there is a plot point – a particularly important piece of the plot which
turns around the lives of the characters, change their relationships and alter
the tone of the film. Films often have a number of plot points like these but
Field points to two major ones between the acts and a less important one in the
middle of the film.
·
Does this work for your
favourite film? A Bond Movie? Speed? Fatal Attraction?
Narrative Theory 6: Stanley Kubrick
Director of Dr Strangelove, The Shining,
2001, and others had the theory that all you needed for a captivating
narrative was seven Non-Submersible Units. These were scenes, images,
actions, sounds or a combination of these that created a strong impression on
the audience that they couldn’t ignore, shrug off or forget.
This is similar to the claim of a script
writer of The Avengers that he thought of ten really good scenes and
then found a plot that would link them up!
(Kubrick won lots of Oscars and got bums on
seats and is viewed as a very important director if not an artist, so maybe he
should be taken more seriously!)
No comments:
Post a Comment