Sunday, April 12, 2015

IB SL Written Assignment Rubric Summative for 2015 3rd Trimester

Written Assignment Rubric –  SL

0

Criterion A: Fulfilling the requirements of the reflective statement
· To what extent does the student show how their understanding of cultural and contextual elements was developed through the interactive oral?

Note: The word limit for the reflective statement is 300–400 words. If the word limit is exceeded, 1 mark will be deducted.
does not reach standard
1
Reflection on the interactive oral shows superficial development of the student’s understanding of cultural and contextual elements.
2
Reflection on the interactive oral shows some development of the student’s understanding of cultural and contextual elements.
3
Reflection on the interactive oral shows development of the student’s understanding of cultural and contextual elements.
Criterion B: Knowledge and understanding
· How effectively has the student used the topic and the essay to show knowledge and understanding of the chosen work?
does not reach standard
1-2
The essay shows some knowledge but little understanding of the work used for the assignment.
3-4
The essay shows knowledge and understanding of, and some insight into, the work used for the assignment.
5-6
The essay shows detailed knowledge and understanding of, and perceptive insight into, the work used for the assignment.
Criterion C: Appreciation of the writer’s choices
· To what extent does the student appreciate how the writer’s choices of language, structure, technique and style shape meaning?
does not reach standard
1-2
There is some mention, but little appreciation, of the ways in which language, structure, technique and style shape meaning.
3-4
There is adequate appreciation of the ways in which language, structure, technique and style shape meaning.
5-6
There is excellent appreciation of the ways in which language, structure, technique and style shape meaning.


0
1
2
3
4
5
Criterion D: Organization and development
· How effectively have the ideas been organized, and how well are references to the works integrated into the development of the ideas?

Note: The word limit for the essay is 1,200–1,500 words. If the word limit is exceeded, 2 marks will be deducted.
does not reach standard
There is some attempt to organize ideas, but little use of examples from the works used.
Ideas are superficially organized and developed, with some integrated examples from
the works used.
Ideas are adequately organized and developed, with appropriately integrated examples from the works used.
Ideas are effectively organized and developed, with well-integrated examples from the works used.
Ideas are persuasively organized and developed, with effectively integrated examples
from the works used.
Criterion E: Language
· How clear, varied and accurate is the language?
· How appropriate is the choice of register, style and terminology? (“Register” refers, in this context, to the student’s use of elements such as vocabulary, tone, sentence structure and terminology appropriate to the task.)
does not reach standard
Language is rarely clear and appropriate; there are many errors in grammar, vocabulary and sentence construction, and little sense of register and style.
Language is sometimes clear and carefully chosen; grammar, vocabulary and sentence construction are fairly accurate, although errors and inconsistencies are apparent; the register and style are to some extent appropriate to the task.
Language is clear and carefully chosen, with an adequate degree of accuracy in
grammar, vocabulary and sentence construction despite some lapses; register and style are mostly appropriate to the task.
Language is clear and carefully chosen, with a good degree of accuracy in grammar,
vocabulary and sentence construction; register and style are consistently appropriate to the task.
Language is very clear, effective, carefully chosen and precise, with a high degree of
accuracy in grammar, vocabulary and sentence construction; register and style are effective and appropriate to the task.

Your 1200-1500 word DRAFT will be due NO LATER THAN Thursday April 30th. It must have correct formatting, including margins, cover page, proper title and MLA formatting. It must go beyond description and summary and be your best literary analysis essay. This draft mark will be your end of year Summative mark. This will be worth 300 points

( I will provide verbal comments and notes on a separate paper, as per IB guidelines) to help you improve your final draft.)

Final Written Assignment 1200-1500 words due no later than May 18th, 2015 hard copy and a copy submitted to Turnitin. You must also sign the IB Cover page and this along with your reflective statement will be submitted to IB for external marking in your SL 2 year. (Your supervised writing will be submitted to the IB as well, but not marked)

You will receive a completion grade of 100 points in Skyward.

Existentialism is a Humanism Cheat Sheet

Existentialism is a Humanism Cheat Sheet
I. Sartre’s Purpose: to defend existentialism against several criticisms
II. Main criticisms:
a. Inviting people to remain in despair
b. To fall back into a middle-class luxury of a impractical philosophy
c. Denying the reality and seriousness of human society because they deny
the existence of God and his values and, therefore, no one can condemn
anyone else.
III. Main refutation: how can it be wrong to question tradition and class
consciousness? We say that all possibility lies within man.
IV. Existentialism has become trendy and seems to mean nothing at all, but in
fact, it does:
a. Atheist existentialism: God does not exist. Man is the center of human
reality.
b. Existence precedes essence: Man first exists and defines himself
afterward by his actions.
c. Man takes responsibility for himself and in doing so, he takes
responsibility for all men because all our actions engage or influence or
even shape humanity.
d. We are anxious because we cannot escape this responsibility for all
humanity.
e. “We are alone, without excuses…man is responsible for his own
passions.”
V. Example: a student of Sartre wants to know if he should go off to war or stay
with his mother who is all alone. Sartre says he must act alone on his will.
VI. Marxist criticism of existentialism: Your actions are limited by your death,
but you can count on others to carry on your fight or message
a. Refutation: No one can count on anyone else, and we are made of what
we, the individual, do. No one else can do our work, and no one else
should.
VII. We cannot judge others; we can only judge whether his choices are founded
on truth or error, and we can judge a man’s sincerity.
VIII. Existentialism is a humanism in that there is only one universe, and it is the

universe of human subjectivity.

Albert Camus' The Myth of Sisyphus

The Myth of Sisyphus


The gods had condemned Sisyphus to ceaselessly rolling a rock to the top of a mountain, whence the stone would fall back of its own weight. They had thought with some reason that there is no more dreadful punishment than futile and hopeless labor.
If one believes Homer, Sisyphus was the wisest and most prudent of mortals. According to another tradition, however, he was disposed to practice the profession of highwayman. I see no contradiction in this. Opinions differ as to the reasons why he became the futile laborer of the underworld. To begin with, he is accused of a certain levity in regard to the gods. He stole their secrets. Ægina, the daughter of Æsopus, was carried off by Jupiter. The father was shocked by that disappearance and complained to Sisyphus. He, who knew of the abduction, offered to tell about it on condition that Æsopus would give water to the citadel of Corinth. To the celestial thunderbolts he preferred the benediction of water. He was punished for this in the underworld. Homer tells us also that Sisyphus had put Death in chains. Pluto could not endure the sight of his deserted, silent empire. He dispatched the god of war, who liberated Death from the hands of her conqueror.
It is said that Sisyphus, being near to death, rashly wanted to test his wife's love. He ordered her to cast his unburied body into the middle of the public square. Sisyphus woke up in the underworld. And there, annoyed by an obedience so contrary to human love, he obtained from Pluto permission to return to earth in order to chastise his wife. But when he had seen again the face of this world, enjoyed water and sun, warm stones and the sea, he no longer wanted to go back to the infernal darkness. Recalls, signs of anger, warnings were of no avail. Many years more he lived facing the curve of the gulf, the sparkling sea, and the smiles of earth. A decree of the gods was necessary. Mercury came and seized the impudent man by the collar and, snatching him from his joys, lead him forcibly back to the underworld, where his rock was ready for him.
You have already grasped that Sisyphus is the absurd hero. He is, as much through his passions as through his torture. His scorn of the gods, his hatred of death, and his passion for life won him that unspeakable penalty in which the whole being is exerted toward accomplishing nothing. This is the price that must be paid for the passions of this earth. Nothing is told us about Sisyphus in the underworld. Myths are made for the imagination to breathe life into them. As for this myth, one sees merely the whole effort of a body straining to raise the huge stone, to roll it, and push it up a slope a hundred times over; one sees the face screwed up, the cheek tight against the stone, the shoulder bracing the clay-covered mass, the foot wedging it, the fresh start with arms outstretched, the wholly human security of two earth-clotted hands. At the very end of his long effort measured by skyless space and time without depth, the purpose is achieved. Then Sisyphus watches the stone rush down in a few moments toward that lower world whence he will have to push it up again toward the summit. He goes back down to the plain.
It is during that return, that pause, that Sisyphus interests me. A face that toils so close to stones is already stone itself! I see that man going back down with a heavy yet measured step toward the torment of which he will never know the end. That hour like a breathing-space which returns as surely as his suffering, that is the hour of consciousness. At each of those moments when he leaves the heights and gradually sinks toward the lairs of the gods, he is superior to his fate. He is stronger than his rock.
If this myth is tragic, that is because its hero is conscious. Where would his torture be, indeed, if at every step the hope of succeeding upheld him? The workman of today works everyday in his life at the same tasks, and his fate is no less absurd. But it is tragic only at the rare moments when it becomes conscious. Sisyphus, proletarian of the gods, powerless and rebellious, knows the whole extent of his wretched condition: it is what he thinks of during his descent. The lucidity that was to constitute his torture at the same time crowns his victory. There is no fate that can not be surmounted by scorn.
If the descent is thus sometimes performed in sorrow, it can also take place in joy. This word is not too much. Again I fancy Sisyphus returning toward his rock, and the sorrow was in the beginning. When the images of earth cling too tightly to memory, when the call of happiness becomes too insistent, it happens that melancholy arises in man's heart: this is the rock's victory, this is the rock itself. The boundless grief is too heavy to bear. These are our nights of Gethsemane. But crushing truths perish from being acknowledged. Thus, Ĺ’dipus at the outset obeys fate without knowing it. But from the moment he knows, his tragedy begins. Yet at the same moment, blind and desperate, he realizes that the only bond linking him to the world is the cool hand of a girl. Then a tremendous remark rings out: "Despite so many ordeals, my advanced age and the nobility of my soul make me conclude that all is well." Sophocles' Ĺ’dipus, like Dostoevsky's Kirilov, thus gives the recipe for the absurd victory. Ancient wisdom confirms modern heroism.
One does not discover the absurd without being tempted to write a manual of happiness. "What!---by such narrow ways--?" There is but one world, however. Happiness and the absurd are two sons of the same earth. They are inseparable. It would be a mistake to say that happiness necessarily springs from the absurd. discovery. It happens as well that the felling of the absurd springs from happiness. "I conclude that all is well," says Ĺ’dipus, and that remark is sacred. It echoes in the wild and limited universe of man. It teaches that all is not, has not been, exhausted. It drives out of this world a god who had come into it with dissatisfaction and a preference for futile suffering. It makes of fate a human matter, which must be settled among men.
All Sisyphus' silent joy is contained therein. His fate belongs to him. His rock is a thing. Likewise, the absurd man, when he contemplates his torment, silences all the idols. In the universe suddenly restored to its silence, the myriad wondering little voices of the earth rise up. Unconscious, secret calls, invitations from all the faces, they are the necessary reverse and price of victory. There is no sun without shadow, and it is essential to know the night. The absurd man says yes and his efforts will henceforth be unceasing. If there is a personal fate, there is no higher destiny, or at least there is, but one which he concludes is inevitable and despicable. For the rest, he knows himself to be the master of his days. At that subtle moment when man glances backward over his life, Sisyphus returning toward his rock, in that slight pivoting he contemplates that series of unrelated actions which become his fate, created by him, combined under his memory's eye and soon sealed by his death. Thus, convinced of the wholly human origin of all that is human, a blind man eager to see who knows that the night has no end, he is still on the go. The rock is still rolling.
I leave Sisyphus at the foot of the mountain! One always finds one's burden again. But Sisyphus teaches the higher fidelity that negates the gods and raises rocks. He too concludes that all is well. This universe henceforth without a master seems to him neither sterile nor futile. Each atom of that stone, each mineral flake of that night filled mountain, in itself forms a world. The struggle itself toward the heights is enough to fill a man's heart. One must imagine Sisyphus happy.
---Albert Camus

Tuesday, March 17, 2015

Learning Log: Post-reading Kafka's letter to his father

Writing About the Novel
Discuss the title of The Metamorphosis and its meaning for the events of the story. Which

characters undergo changes? What are these changes, and how are they brought about?


Focus Question
What causes conflicts between human beings? How can conflicts be peacefully resolved?
Background
It would, perhaps, be difficult to find a father and a son who were more different from each other than
Hermann and Franz Kafka. Hermann was robust, outgoing, and domineering. Franz was frail, introspective, and insecure. Given the differences between them, it is not surprising that they were often at odds.
When Franz was in his thirties, he wrote his father a letter in which he analyzed their strained relationship.
The selection is from the opening passage of the letter.
Responding to the Reading
1. According to Kafka, what is the purpose of the letter? What other purposes might the letter serve?
2. What does Kafka see as the major cause of the conflicts between him and his father? The major effects?
3. Describe the tone of the letter. How might this tone help fulfill the stated purpose of the letter?
4. Making Connections What parallels do you see between Kafka’s relationship with his father and the father-son relationship portrayed in The Metamorphosis?

Learning Log: Chapter 3 Metamorphosis

  1.  Focus Activity: As the title The Metamorphosis  suggests, the characters in the novella undergo significant changes in their lives. Use this blog post to comment and start to make notes about changes that each character undergoes. (Add this to your own Google Doc note taking)
  2. Analyze Meaning The word translated as vermin in the first sentence of The Metamorphosis is Ungeziefer in the original German. As Kafka probably knew, Ungeziefer derives from a Middle High German word meaning “an unclean animal not suited for sacrifice.” What meaning do you think this word conveys about the nature of Gregor’s metamorphosis? Do you think that his death can be seen as a sacrifice in any sense? In a few paragraphs, explain why or why not.
  3. Extending Your Response Literature Groups (We will do this in class)Many critics have pointed out that The Metamorphosis has elements of the parable, a story that illustrates a moral lesson. With a group of classmates, review the novella and discuss what moral lesson or lessons The Metamorphosis might illustrate. Then present your conclusions to other groups in your class.

Existentialism and Surrealism Themes and Kafka, Camus

 Resource from J. Brachenfeld 2013 Existentialist Themes:
Absurdity
Meaning/Meaninglessness
Responsibility
Authenticity
Alienation
Influence
Other
The Look (Observation)
Boredom
Freedom
Individuality
Existence
Essence
Actions
Definition
Despair

Religion

Definition Existentialism: the attempt to define ourselves or give meaning to our lives despite the
influence of a world in which we experience despair, angst, alienation, absurdity, and boredom.
(1800s to post World War II)
 Concepts:

Existence: “Existence precedes essence,” so we all exist at the beginning, and our essence is
determined through our life choices, and yet we exist within a world that is distant from us, that
alienates us, that is absurd, but that constantly influences us.
We are often faced with the possible breakdown of meaningful things in our world, and this
causes us angst about the meaninglessness of the world, and yet we must continue to give our
lives meaning.
The human being, through his consciousness, creates his own values, morals, and meaning to
his life.

1. Each person defines themselves through their actions
2. Each person is responsible for their own actions

 In other words, they reject that someone or something else is responsible for their actions or
for the meaning of their lives. A person chooses how to act or be, and they are responsible for
the results of those choices. In doing so, they are responsible for creating themselves, and by
extension, all humanity; therefore, each individual has a responsibility for all of mankind in our
choices, and this can lead to anxiety, angst, and despair.
Angst:  anxiety or concern over what can possibly happen or what will happen in the world
Freedom : freedom to choose to live an authentic life and the refusal to live an inauthentic life.
Authenticity:  If you define yourself by how others see you and you live your life and make
decisions based on others’ definitions or rules, you are not living an authentic life. To live an
authentic life, you must live true to yourself, how you define yourself, and what choices you make
for yourself.
Example: your parents want you to go a certain college; because they went there and they’re
paying, you decide to go, even though you’d rather go to a different college. This would be an
inauthentic decision.
Despair:  the breakdown of meaningful things in your life as a result of the world, which leads to
a breakdown in your identity.
Alienation : the act of being isolated or estranged from society and feeling alone in the universe.
Typically, this is due to perceived differences between the individual and the group. Individuals
can alienate themselves from the group or society, the group or society may alienate the
individual, or both.
The Other : anything outside of your existence which influences the meaning of your life. This
could be any parents, friends, boss, job, government, church, dogma, principle, schema, etc. that
exerts influence upon how you define yourself and give meaning to your life.
The Look : you perceive others, they perceive you, and you perceive yourself. Sartre uses the
allegory of looking through the keyhole (you perceive others); you think you hear a creak of the
floorboards behind you (you think others are perceiving you); you turn and find no one there (you
perceive yourself).
Absurdity : the sense that the world is ridiculous or illogical.
Boredom : feeling weary with the world because there is nothing to interest you in the world.
Reason : existentialists are opposed to reason, since it would be an imposed form of structure
which is unreasonable in a world which is inherently irrational and absurd.

So! You  You exist, and therefore you attempt to create meaning for your life through your
actions for which you are responsible. In creating meaning, you attempt to live an
authentic life, despite the angst of feeling despair because you are constantly exposed
to the influence of the Other, or the influence of a world in which you feel alienation,
absurdity, or irrationality. Yet, you still attempt to find that meaning.


 Albert Camus: saw the nature of people (although he rejected himself as an existentialist) as
existing within a world that is pointless and absurd, a world in which there is futility of existence
yet we try to find meaning. He was essentially an absurdist, although many considered him an
existentialist or nihilist.

 Franz Kafka (3 July 1883 – 3 June 1924) was a novelist and writer of short stories whose works,
some of which were published only after his death, came to be regarded as some of the major
achievements of 20th century literature.
He was born to middle-class German-speaking Jewish parents in Prague, Bohemia, now part of
the Czech Republic, in what was then the Austro-Hungarian Empire.
Kafka's work, which includes his novels, The Trial (1925), The Castle (1926) and Amerika (1927),
and his short stories that include The Metamorphosis (1912) and In the Penal Colony (1914), is
now considered among the most influential in Western literature. Much of his work, unfinished at
the time of his death, was published posthumously.
His father was described as a "huge, selfish, overbearing” and he was a very authoritarian,
dominating and domineering presence in Kafka’s life. His mother was often away helping Kafka’s
father with the business, and Kafka and his siblings were mainly raised by a governess and
servants.
Franz had two younger brothers who died in infancy, and he had two three younger sisters. His
youngest sister, Ottla, later became his caretaker, much like Grete takes care of Gregor in The
Metamorphosis. His sisters would all eventually die in the gas chambers of Auschwitz in 1943.
Kafka spoke German and Czech. He wasn’t very religious and had a very basic relationship
with Judaism. He attended school and later the University, where he met Max Brod, who would
become a close friend. Kafka obtained his law degree in 1906.
He worked at the Worker’s Accident Insurance Institute, which was mostly to pay the bills. He
hated the job, but he was described as a “diligent and capable employee.” This was very similar
to Gregor. He always wrote his short stories and fiction, though, and together with his friends
Max Brod and Felix Weltsch, he became part of the Prague Circle of German-Jewish writers and
intellectuals.
In 1917, he began to suffer from tuberculosis, a disease where the tubercules in the lungs swell
and cause difficulty in breathing and swallowing. His sister Ottla came to be his caretaker. He
described himself as being repulsive, but others found him charming, witty, and attractive. He is
believed to have suffered from clinical depression, social anxiety disorder, and migraines. His
tuberculosis worsened, and in 1924, he died from starvation as a result of the tuberculosis. It is
widely believed that his short story “The Hunger Artist” was based on his medical condition.
His friend, Max Brod, published his works posthumously to critical success. Kafka never knew.
His works are characterized by characters who find themselves in absurd situations beyond their
control. Alienation and aspects of existentialism pervade his works. Critics also see a Marxist
influence in his work.
The term “ Kafkaesque” describes a situation, concept, or idea which is similar to Kafka’s novels
in that it is absurd, senseless, disorienting.

 Camus

  The Stranger: know the characters, the events of the novel, and the general themes and
philosophy at play, especially the attempt to live an authentic life despite the fact that the
world is absurd.
Albert Camus (Nov. 7, 1914 – Jan. 4, 1960) was born in French Algeria to a poor family. His
father died when he was young, and Camus went to work right out of school, much like his
character Meursault. He was very involved in socialist causes for workers’ rights. Camus
moved to Paris, where he became friendly with Sartre. Camus didn’t consider himself to be
an existentialist.  Instead, he believed that life was meaningless and absurd, and ultimately,
any attempt to find meaning in the universe will ultimately fail; in other words, he appeared to
be a nihilist. His characters, though, attempt to live authentic lives despite the absurdity of the
universe. This tendency, as well as several essays against the nihilism of writer Andre Breton,
has led many to see Camus as an absurdist, not a nihilist. Although he exhibits traits of all three
philosophies, he is best known as an absurdist.
During the time when Camus lived in Algeria, Algeria was a colony of France (French Algeria).
The main governing party weakened in power, and four other factions, including an Algerian
independence party fought for power. Riots broke out in Algeria, and these protests and riots
occurred in Paris, as well. The Paris Café Massacre of 1961 took place when protestors for
Algerian independence were attacked by the Paris police, beaten, and thrown unconscious into
the River Seine. By this time, Camus has already written publicly for the rights of workers, native
Algerians (both Arab and pied-noir French-Algerian), and socialists, while he wrote against capital
punishment, which won him the Nobel Prize in Literature.
Camus ultimately had a falling out with Sartre and de Beauvoir over communism (Camus was
socialist but not communist), which he never repaired. He was killed in a car crash in 1960.

From T H E G L E N C O E L I T E R A T U R E L I B R A R Y BACKGROUND Franz Kafka and “Isms”
Kafka’s fiction is so rich and ambiguous that his short stories and novels can be interpreted in many different ways. Because of these many different interpretations, his work has been “adopted” by different schools of critics as especially appropriate to their beliefs and theories. Ultimately, no one way of interpreting Kafka seems broad enough to stand alone.
The early nineteenth-century movement known as expressionism was based on the belief that inner
reality, or a person’s thoughts and feelings, are more important than the “objective” reality outside the person.
In short, the response of an individual is more important than the object or situation that causes the
response. Expressionist writers, painters, and other artists tend to portray this inner reality through the use of symbolic rather than realistic characters, exaggeration, distortion, nightmarish imagery, and fantasy.
Expressionism grew out of the paintings of Vincent van Gogh and the dramas of Swedish playwright
August Strindberg. It was most popular in Germany in the early 1900s.
Another movement that has claimed Kafka as one of its own is surrealism. Surrealism, or “super realism,”developed in France in the early 1900s as a reaction to realism and stressed the power of the imagination and dreams over conscious control. Surrealist painters like Salvador Dali depicted objects as they could never appear in reality, such as his famous drooping watches.
Another philosophical, religious, and artistic movement that has its modern roots in France and Germany is existentialism. Although it dates to the early 1800s, existentialism gained its most popular form in the writings
of French writers such as Jean-Paul Sartre and Albert Camus in the years following World War II. While existentialism has many different forms, one of its most important elements is a belief that people are “created” by the experiences they undergo. It is action and making choices that give life meaning. Many existentialists did not believe in God, but rather felt that human beings were free to make their own moral choices in life.

 One final movement that has claimed Franz Kafka is Freudianism,  a theory of psychology based on the ideas of Austrian psychologist Sigmund Freud. Freud believed that every human action is influenced by the unconscious mind. Early experiences, such as one’s relationship with one’s father, have a profound effect on the development of the unconscious. Kafka’s complex relationship with his own father and the ways in which he addressed their strained relationship in his fiction have especially appealed to Freudians.
_______________________________

From A. Metaxas Resources:
Apply the SEE THINK WONDER routine to the following video and the powerpoint on Visual Arts and Expressionism. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilg7PiDD8yY

SEE: Take notes on what you see/hear
THINK: How might we relate this to Kafka’s novel? 
WONDER: How does this philosophical way of thinking make you wonder about our own life and culture in 2015 and your own life context?

Apply this to your note taking google doc for social, cultural and philosophical context